Critical Perspectives on Federal Failure in Federalism Studies

Federalism, a system of government in which power is divided between a central government and regional governments, has been widely studied and debated by scholars. While federalism has been praised for its ability to balance local autonomy with national unity, it has also been criticized for its potential to create imbalances of power and lead to political gridlock. In recent years, there has been a growing body of scholarship that has taken a critical perspective on federalism, arguing that it can be a source of inequality, discrimination, and even failure.

Theoretical Foundations of Critical Federalism

Critical federalism scholars draw on a variety of theoretical perspectives, including critical race theory, feminist theory, and postcolonial theory. These perspectives share a common focus on the ways in which power is distributed and exercised in society, and they all challenge the traditional assumptions of federalism.

Defunct Federalisms: Critical Perspectives on Federal Failure (Federalism Studies)

by Eduard Bernstein

4.1 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1143 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	221 pages
Hardcover	:	226 pages
Item Weight	:	12.7 ounces
Dimensions	:	6.14 x 0.56 x 9.21 inches
X-Ray for textbooks	:	Enabled

FREE

Critical race theory, for example, argues that race is a social construct that has been used to justify the oppression of people of color. Critical federalism scholars have applied this perspective to the study of federalism, arguing that federalism can be a tool for perpetuating racial inequality. For example, they point to the fact that the United States Constitution allowed for the continuation of slavery in the South, and that the federal government has often failed to protect the civil rights of African Americans.

Feminist theory argues that gender is a social construct that has been used to justify the subordination of women. Critical federalism scholars have applied this perspective to the study of federalism, arguing that federalism can be a tool for perpetuating gender inequality. For example, they point to the fact that women have historically been underrepresented in political office, and that the federal government has often failed to address the needs of women.

Postcolonial theory argues that colonialism has had a lasting impact on the development of the modern world. Critical federalism scholars have applied this perspective to the study of federalism, arguing that federalism can be a tool for perpetuating postcolonial relationships. For example, they point to the fact that many former colonies are now federal states, and that these states often have a difficult time reconciling their local autonomy with their dependence on the former colonial power.

Empirical Evidence of Federal Failure

Critical federalism scholars have also produced a growing body of empirical evidence that supports their claims about the potential for federal failure. For example, they have shown that federalism can lead to imbalances of power between different regions of a country. They have also shown that federalism can create political gridlock, making it difficult for the government to address pressing issues.

One of the most well-known examples of federal failure is the United States. The United States Constitution established a federal system of government, but it also allowed for the continuation of slavery in the South. This led to a long and bloody civil war, which resulted in the deaths of over 600,000 people.

Another example of federal failure is the European Union. The European Union is a supranational organization that has been established to promote economic and political cooperation among its member states. However, the European Union has been plagued by a number of problems in recent years, including the Greek debt crisis and the Brexit referendum. These problems have led to a loss of confidence in the European Union, and they have raised questions about the future of the organization.

Implications for Federalism Theory and Practice

The critical perspective on federalism has a number of implications for federalism theory and practice. First, it challenges the traditional assumptions of federalism. Second, it provides a new framework for understanding the causes and consequences of federal failure. Third, it offers some potential solutions to the problems of federalism.

The traditional assumptions of federalism include the following:

* Federalism is a system of government that is based on the division of power between a central government and regional governments. * Federalism is a system of government that is designed to protect the rights of individuals and minorities. * Federalism is a system of government that is efficient and effective.

Critical federalism scholars challenge these assumptions. They argue that federalism can be a source of inequality, discrimination, and failure. They also argue that federalism is not always efficient or effective.

The critical perspective on federalism provides a new framework for understanding the causes and consequences of federal failure. Critical federalism scholars argue that federal failure can be caused by a number of factors, including:

* Imbalances of power between different regions of a country * Political gridlock * Discrimination against certain groups of people * The legacy of colonialism

Critical federalism scholars also argue that federal failure can have a number of negative consequences, including:

* Political instability * Economic inequality * Social unrest

The critical perspective on federalism offers some potential solutions to the problems of federalism. Critical federalism scholars argue that federalism can be reformed to make it more equitable, democratic, and effective. They propose a number of reforms, including:

* Increasing the representation of marginalized groups in government * Reducing the power of the central government * Strengthening the protections for individual rights and minorities * Promoting economic equality

The critical perspective on federalism is a growing body of scholarship that challenges the traditional assumptions of federalism. Critical federalism scholars argue that federalism can be a source of inequality, discrimination, and failure. They also argue that federalism is not always efficient or effective. The critical perspective on federalism has a number of implications for federalism theory and practice. It provides a new framework for understanding the causes and consequences of federal failure. It also offers some potential solutions to the problems of federalism.

Additional Resources

* [Critical Federalism: A New Perspective on Federalism](https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/critical-federalism/C081D09063ADE582FD832AB189AFA64D) * [The Oxford Handbook of Critical Federalism](https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-critical-federalism-9780198817179?cc=us&lang=en) * [Federalism and Failure](https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/697927)

Defunct Federalisms: Critical Perspectives on Federal Failure (Federalism Studies)

by Eduard Bernstein

4.1 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1143 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	221 pages
Hardcover	:	226 pages
Item Weight	:	12.7 ounces
Dimensions	:	6.14 x 0.56 x 9.21 inches
X-Ray for textbooks	:	Enabled

FREE